You know who I haven’t seen the media describe as vandals, nor put any effort into identifying? Those tearing down 100-year-old statues across the country, including those of abolitionists and Founding Fathers. If a guy in a black mask and an anarchy A throws red paint on century-old Washington statute, it’s part of a “peaceful protest” against systematic racism. But let a white woman throw some paint on a two week old BLM screed and it’s suddenly all hands on deck.
Meanwhile, the media are still avoiding identifying the race of the man who ran over a woman and killed her in Seattle. Why? Because he was black and it was likely an accident, therefore it doesn’t fit the narrative. They’d rather continue to insinuate it was a white supremacist by being purposely vague in their headlines.
In the case of the Seattle incident, where a white (stupid, indoctrinated, Marxist) woman was hit and killed by a black man, the media has stooped to saying that she was hit by a "luxury car".
The media is an absolute dumpster fire of anti-American bullshit, and it proves that fact every single day.
Anyways, if I were the cops, I'd take that report, and toss it in the circular file the moment I got back to the station. "Oh, someone painted over a BLM bullshit mural that was painted on a public road? Gosh, how horrible. Yes Karen, I'll get right on that."
2 comments:
They Lie, They Omit, And They Distort Everything. They do not report the news, they spew leftist propaganda. Everything they do is dishonest, everything they do is against American interests.
The real criminal is not the driver, it is the clowns who closed an interstate highway to allow a bunch of commie fucktards hold a party.
The driver stopped. He didn't aim for anybody.
Saw where people are calling him a white supremacist, very twisted logic, to get there, but they are
Post a Comment