Day by Day

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Absolutely sick

We live in an age where people who are supposed to protect children are now lobbying for people to be able to molest them.  This is from (formerly Great) Britain.

EVIDENCE has emerged that the views of the Paedophile Information Exchange influenced policy-making at the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was run by former Labour Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt. 
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary. 
It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14. 
“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage. 
“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’. 
“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage. 
“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”
Just stop and take a look at those statements.  These people are arguing FOR paedophilia, and they were lobbying the government of England to allow it.  And they actually had people who were listening to them!  It brings to mind something I posted last year, from someone who's seen it first-hand.

What sets gay culture apart from straight culture is the belief that early sex is good and beneficial, and the sure knowledge (don’t think for a second that they DON’T know) that the only way to produce another homosexual is to provide a boy with sexual experiences BEFORE he can be “ruined” by attraction to a girl.

There is absolutely no good reason for an adult to be having sex with a kid.  None.  There is no good reason for people to advocate child/adult sexual activities.  None.  Period, full stop.  If there is someone out there advocating for adults to be able to have sex with children, it's because they either WANT to do so, or are already doing so.

I'm guessing the latter, based on what I've seen in this modern age.

1 comment:

Bill in England said...

The rot from this particular strain of scum goes deep in this country. No wonder they turned a blind eye to the Rotherham horror.

Actually, "turned a blind eye" is too kind. That nest of filth was actively aided and abetted by local politicos. I hope some day a real rain will come.