Spot the similarities

Oxford.
Rochdale.
Newcastle.
Bristol.
Aylesbury.
Peterborough.
Rotherham.

What do they all have in common?

They are British towns that have all had muslim rape-gangs, grooming and raping women and girls as young as 13, if not younger. 

Folks, this is what they do.  This is what they do in their countries, and this is what they will do in ours.  I don't know how much more obvious it needs to be.  All the hippy-dippy bullshit about peace and love doesn't mean jack to them.  Take a look at what they do before you let them in to your country, your towns, your communities.

Because I'm pretty sure that much as in Britain, the people who complain about it will be jailed, while the authorities look the other way as young girls are raped over and over and over.  They don't want to be called "racist", you know.  But unlike Britain, we Americans still have our guns, and fathers are willing to ensure that the filthy animals who raped his daughter won't rape anyone else.  Ever.  And the results of that will be far worse than not allowing them entry in the first place.

ZOMG TRADE WAR PANIC AAAAAAAAHHHH!

Or not.  I have said it before, and some people at work actually rocked back and thought about it when I challenged them with this:  I will accept the prognostications of a "trade war" when they can explain to me why our tariffs are bad, but all the existing tariffs of our trading partners are good.  80% tariff on our steel in Germany, but we don't have that against theirs?  270% tariffs on our dairy products in Canada?  That's "free trade"?  No, that's free-loading trade.

Anyways, those days are on hold for at least a little bit.

They are seeking to ensure their own gravy train doesn't get derailed. This is why they tell you, in between informing you how stupid you are, that there are only a few tariffs out there and they don't matter. Well, they sure as heck don't matter to these think tank jockeys and media scribblers. They are not the guys getting up at 4 a.m. to milk the cows or to harvest the soybeans the tariffs target. They've never worked on a vehicle assembly line in their lives, so what’s it matter to them if Germany’s tariff on US cars is four times ours to theirs? Of course, the tariffs on US products don't matter to the elite. They aren’t the guys who lose their jobs when their company picks up and moves to Vietnam.

Read it all, of course.

To ask the question is to answer it

Can the GOP establishment stop being idiots just once?  I think we all know the answer to that one.

Why are Congressional Republicans so much more effective at implementing the liberal agenda than the Democrats are? Why do they insist on risking electoral suicide time and time again by trying to jam amnesty down our throats after we keep telling them to jam it elsewhere?

Most of the GOP establishment don't actually believe a damn word of what they say on the campaign trail.  They say what they need to say in order to get the rubes to elect them, and they're pissed off as all get out that the voters are actually demanding that they do what they said they were going to do.

These geniuses have considered all the possible ways to use the limited legislative time available to implement a conservative agenda and decided that the big legislative priority during the ramp-up to the midterms must be handing citizenship to a bunch of future Democrats who shouldn’t even be here in the first place – and all over the thunderous objections of GOP voters.

You would think Jeff Flake getting chased out of office might have been a clue.  But then, if these idiots actually had a clue, the election of Donald Trump over their objections would have been the first one.  But no, they continue to stab America in the back.  Fuck 'em.  Vote 'em out.  Hard.

These are not the fans you're looking for

Disney decides that the smart thing to do is insult all the fans who object to Star Wars being turned into SWJ diatribes. 

There is no evidence for this "harassing female actors and artists for existing." This is simply the Lady Ghostbusters playbook, being run after the disaster instead of before it. 

By the way, this article is not from the Huffington Post or Buzzfeed; this is from Forbes, which is one of the most obnoxious of the Disney Shill Sites and Social Justice Warrior propaganda outposts.

By the way, have I mentioned how happy I am that I cancelled my subscription to Forbes?  They've gone downhill fast, and they're picking up speed.

The "Most Transparent Administration EVAH!" does what it does best

Hide shit from America.

It seems that Hillary Clinton’s issues with transparency were rather widespread during the Obama Administration years – and it’s going to affect history, research, and scholarship on that period forever, because the National Archives are missing records that they should have had.

Obama records missing?  Just like his college records?  And damn near every other record he's had a chance to touch? 

YOU DON'T SAY!!!!!

We will never learn the amount of damage that jug-eared fucking communist did to this country.

Good morning!

Good morning, everyone.  :) pic.twitter.com/XrizeIiYqE

— prop op (@ProperOpinion) June 11, 2018

I've been watching this for about 10 minutes, and I can't stop giggling.

Man and woman he made them

So apparently some Lefty outlet tried to explain how monogamy was just this recent thing made up by bad people, and polygamy is awesome.

And someone came along, and beat them with a clue-bat.  Not that it'll to much good for the Lefties.  What you have to realize is that this wasn't some Lefty trying to figure out why we are the way we are.  This was a Lefty who wanted to normalize his lifestyle (or more likely, his desired lifestyle), and thus created bullshit out of thin air and put it to a video.  For example:

Funnily enough, in the source from which Vox sources its testicle size data, the volume Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems (2009), primatologist Alan F. Dixson argues against the ideas Ryan describes regarding sperm competition in humans. 

So the Lefty quotes a source to support his claim even though his source directly refutes his claim.  This is classic Leftism.  Because the Lefty didn't think anyone would actually look at his source.  He thought that all his fellow polygamists would nod their heads, say "Oh he's so smart!" and then his video would be used over and over and over until it became canon law.

Rather than explaining monogamy, the Vox video portrays it as something alien and largely useless. It seems like this particular narrative was deliberately chosen before a frame of video had been shot. The expert they interviewed who got much of the detail right was David Barash, yet he was given the least screen time. I suspect they chose him because he wrote a book (which the makers of the video almost certainly did not read) called The Myth of Monogamy. But once they started talking to him they were perhaps disappointed to discover that the title refers to the historical prevalence of polygyny, and not the polyamorous utopia described by Christopher Ryan.

Emphasis mine.  Welcome to the world we live in.