And I'm still not getting the jab

 Doctors talk about the negative side effects of the non-vax, and how politics are preventing it from being discussed.

Writing in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine Doctor Joseph Lapado and Yale School of Public Health Doctor Harvey Risch warn there are legitimate and serious concerns about the side effects of the Wuhan coronavirus vaccine. They also worry vaccine politics could be preventing officials from telling Americans the truth about the risks. 

"One remarkable aspect of the Covid-19 pandemic has been how often unpopular scientific ideas, from the lab-leak theory to the efficacy of masks, were initially dismissed, even ridiculed, only to resurface later in mainstream thinking. Differences of opinion have sometimes been rooted in disagreement over the underlying science. But the more common motivation has been political," they write. "Another reversal in thinking may be imminent. Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of Covid-19 vaccines have been underestimated. But the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking—for now." 

So a non-vax for a disease that was over-blown and over-hyped for political reasons might lead to other suppression of information?  Huh.  Kind of like how the results from hydroxychloriquine and Ivermectin were suppressed.  And the lab leak information was suppressed.  In fact, the greatest threat from this virus was political, and the political damage has been done.