In the letter to Wisconsin businessmen, however, we see why so-called collective bargaining is particularly corrupting to the police. Although the letter explicitly threatens only an economic boycott, when it is written on behalf of the police--of those on whom all citizens depend to protect their safety--it invariably raises the prospect of another kind of boycott. Can a businessman who declines this heavy-handed "request" be confident that the police will do their job if he is the victim of a crime--particularly if the crime itself is in retaliation for his refusal to support "the dedicated public employees who serve our communities"?Sykes sums up the letter this way: "That's a nice business you got there. Pity if anything were to happen to it if, say, you didn't toe the line and denounce Governor Walker like we're asking nice-like." He's right. "Organized" law enforcement bears a disturbing resemblance to organized crime.
Just another reason why unions have outlived their usefulness. Why don't the police show up with baseball bats and threaten to knee-cap the business if they refuse to support the unions? That's about what's going on here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. If you do not see your comment immediately, wait until I get home from work.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.