Tuesday, November 20, 2007

The (D)emocrat's Mexifada

There is a common theme that has emerged amongst the posts on my blog this week. See if it leaps out at you too.
CNN MassDerbate
Doug Ross:All six of CNN's "undecided voters" were Democratic operatives

A Democratic Party bigwig

An antiwar activist

A Union official

An Islamic leader

A Harry Reid staffer

A radical Chicano separatist
In other words... a representative sample of the (D)emocrat party.

By "radical Chicano separatist" he means:
"my name is George R. Ambriz, former student of Western New Mexico University, more importantly, a former M.E.Ch.A. President... we worked in sync... with the local and state Democratic Party to inform many people about the importance of voting..."
MEChA is a race-based supremacist organization... kinda like the KKK, or La Raza

These are race-based activist groups the (D)emocrat party have embraced as preferential constituencies to the extent they will showcase their claims of 'victimhood' in staged "debates" of the "issues". If you are outraged by that consider the obvious next step of criminalizing the exposure of the haters:
Orwell was an Englishman
Iain Murray notes that when viewers complained about broadcasts that showed video of a hate-spewing Islamo-fascist Imam the authorities investigated the network that dared broadcast that video.
Criminalization that includes the John Doe lawsuits against the whistleblowers baited by the flying Imams stage play as well as:

The Libel Tourist

In a now infamous case of "libel tourism" Cambridge University Press not only capitulated to a lawsuit by pulping copies of Alms for Jihad (a book about the funding of terrorism), but even called on American libraries to withdraw and destroy their own copies of the book.
Only in the UK? Sorry, No. The tactics are already in use here:
Oregon exports 'Red Shirt' trainees

Oregon's gov't union operatives have trained, aided and abetted voter-blockers in Oklahoma and other states.
These "voter-blockers" were stopping signature gathering on voter initiatives to remove race-based preferences. Watch the video to see real "Brown Shirt" tactics in their developmental stage.

Then consider the MainStreamMedia's propaganda campaign to create the false perception that there are victims at risk:
AP lies to advance the agenda : Hate crimes rose 8 percent in 2006
The fact that far less then 1/1000 criminal events could be described, by the victims, as a "hate crime", does not make them a "hate crime". Additionally the infrequency of such 'rare' events undermines any trend analysis even if you did use the same "reporting agencies" from year to year.

...

Your chances of winning the lottery are greater then being a victim of a "hate crime" in America... unless it's self-inflicted to "raise-awareness"
Then consider the hypocrisy of the faux-victim Tawana Brawley, who like the Jena-6 and the false accuser of the Duke La Crosse players, who all were in fact committing a racially biased 'hate crime' while demanding preferential treatment as hate-crime victims.

But just when you thought the (D)emocrats couldn't provide any more material aid to the race-baiting agenda you read this:
¿Habla EspaƱol?
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has moved to kill an amendment that would protect employers from federal lawsuits for requiring their workers to speak English. Among the employers targeted by such lawsuits: the Salvation Army.
Now do you believe that (D)emocrats want Illegals to provide the votes Americans Won't!
Ugly Clinton Rising
Hillary(D) is an activist for illegal aliens... just google how many times she has spoken before the racist organization La Raza, NCLR, (which tranlates as 'The Race'), whose motto is:
"For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada"

(For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing)
Did you really think it stopped with drivers licenses for illegals?

My point? The common theme?

Are you one of the preferential 'victim class'... or their intended target?

I don't care what color, or what religion, or sex or creed etc etc anyone is... I, and my family, even qualify for a number of these preferential groups. I just don't happen to be a racial supremacist.

The risks? Besides diversion of our tax-dollars against our will to racially defined preference groups?

CIA/FBI agent Jihad Jane
Richard Spencer:
An espionage case has come to light in Detroit that has a little of everything: besides espionage, there’s an illegal immigration angle, a Keystone Kops angle, and even involvement of major presidential candidates. It would make a great movie -- if this kind of thing doesn’t kill us first.
Debbie Schlussel:
Prouty's lawbreaking was eventually exposed because of ongoing investigations of her brother-in-law, indicted Hezbollah financier Talal Chahine (to whom she is accused of disclosing classified information on three Hezbollah-related investigations that involve him).
Richard Spencer:
Several weeks ago I wrote about La Shish, a restaurant chain owned by Talal Chahine, who has fled the country to escape indictment for evading taxes and sending the restaurant money to Hizballah (to the tune of $20 million). La Shish was one of the sponsors of the Arab American Institute’s recent conference, where Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards addressed the crowd via video, while Bill Richardson, Dennis Kucinich and Republican candidate Ron Paul attended in person.
The candidates were falling all over themselves to condemn “racial profiling” -- anti-terror efforts be damned -- and grovel for the Arab vote. Did they know that one of the conference’s principal sponsors was under indictment for funding a terrorist group?

So do you really believe
"There's no relationship between immigration and terrorism." -- a spokeswoman for the National Council of La Raza after 9/11

Cross Posted at DANEgerus

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated. If you do not see your comment immediately, wait until I get home from work.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.