Whilst surfing last week, I found an interesting point about how political speech in church is portrayed differently depending on who's doing the speaking. When Republicans do it, it "theocratic. When Democrats do it, it's "outreach". Hmmm. That got me doing more surfing, and I found the following, and the accompanying pictures. "Let's take a look at our Constitution — it says ‘freedom of speech,'" said William Murray, president of the Washington D.C.-based Religious Freedom Coalition. "It doesn't say ‘freedom of speech unless you are in church on Sunday.' [Opponents] want to pass laws that say when we have freedom of speech and what we can say and society doesn't have a problem with that?"In fairness, some anti-church-poltitical-speech do try to play it down the middle: Complaints and investigations are more commonplace and often target churches on both sides of the ideological spectrum. In, February the IRS announced it is investigating the Friendship Missionary Baptist Church (search) in Florida, based on a complaint by Americans for the Separation of Church and State.Odd, isn't it? I don't recall that coverage. I've never been particularly vested in the participation of churches in politics, but it does ring true to me that the kind of political speech the Left seeks to restrict most ardently is political speech wherein advocacies are steeped in religion. Or is it all a fan dance? -- as the accompanying pictures (of the last four Democrat presidents, seeking support in church) might seem to indicate. It's all very strange to me, this Liberal Media thing. FOXNews.com - Politics - Lawmaker Hopes to Open Churches to Political Speech |
You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. - Robert A. Heinlein -
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. If you do not see your comment immediately, wait until I get home from work.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.